GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
they had to ADMIT that they had no actual evidence to bring
Several attorneys including Giuliani and Powell were sanctioned and in October, 2021 the Supreme Court refused to hear their appeal in which attorneys had financial sanctions imposed on them by the judge because the "lawsuit was filed with a woeful lack of investigation into the law and, under the circumstances, the facts."
The attorney appealed to the 10th Circuit Court which stated "an attorney is expected to exercise judgment, and must 'regularly re-evaluate the merits' of claims and 'avoid prolonging meritless claims.'"
There have been countless court hearings on the Trump lies and all have failed.
The truth of the matter is that no court, anywhere, would hear the cases. Up to and including the Supreme Court, where several US States filed cases in the one-and-only "court of original jurisdiction" as set forth in the US Constitution (Art. III, Sec. 2) ... only to be told that they somehow had "no standing" there. Every single one of the objections, in every Court high to low, were magically dismissed on "procedural" grounds. None of them were ever heard. Evidence was never accepted. Juries were never convened.
Like so many things in this life: "Be careful what you wish for."
I will agree with that statement if you change "Evidence was never accepted" to "Evidence was never presented."
Michael Cohen on his first day of testimony: his demeanor has been flawless.
The former President is falling asleep during the testimony.
That seems to be the pattern. The prosecution witnesses are presenting critical detail flawlessly, and the redirect is not only ineffective it is often counter-effective and slams home the prosecution points.
He should have just plead guilty and negotiated a deal (he used to say he was the best negotiator) with no days in prison. This would all have been over long since and he would be fundraising and stumping the way he claims he would if not for this trial.
He should have just plead guilty and negotiated a deal (he used to say he was the best negotiator) with no days in prison. This would all have been over long since and he would be fundraising and stumping the way he claims he would if not for this trial.
Agreed. It really does seem like the prosecution is finishing their case with strength. If there is a guilty verdict I wonder if the former President will get probation or an ankle bracelet?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.