GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
And btw, the reason Biden seems to do better when broadcast unedited than he does in the highly doctored clips you hoover from right-wing sites? It's not because he's on PEDs.
And btw, the reason Biden seems to do better when broadcast unedited than he does in the highly doctored clips you hoover from right-wing sites? It's not because he's on PEDs.
Not me, might be you. I see how well turdeau is working out for you all up north!
I clicked on the leftmost one only, and I literally laughed out loud. If the only way you can maintain your worldview is by focusing exclusively on Trump's first three years (when he was being carried by Obama's success) and mentally blocking out his fourth, then yeah, that's on you.
Obummer's success? Like them obummer phones and obummer health care? Now thats some funny shit right there, I dont care who you are! This meme most likely describes you very well. The first part. You didnt answer about your great leader, turdeau, Fidel's son.
Keep talking, Mr. font of off-topic right-wing memes from right-wing sites. Thank you for dropping the pretense of being neutral. I'm just leaning back and watching you confirm my point about your information sources...
Keep talking, Mr. font of off-topic right-wing memes from right-wing sites. Thank you for dropping the pretense of being neutral. I'm just leaning back and watching you confirm my point about your information sources...
EDIT: No need to respond to the above. Nor to reiterate points I've already made.
Anyway, this is what Biden's campaign said when Trump made the same demand in 2020. I'd imagine that, apart from the first word, it's still their position:
Quote:
Vice President Biden intends to deliver his debate answers in words. If the president thinks his best case is made in urine he can have at it
EDIT: No need to respond to the above. Nor to reiterate points I've already made.
Anyway, this is what Biden's campaign said when Trump made the same demand in 2020. I'd imagine that, apart from the first word, it's still their position:
Those who refuse to identify and acknowledge corruption in something are soon engulfed in the corruption and become a part of the corruption. It much easier for them to hide their head in the sand and ignore the facts than it is to stand and fight for what is right. Therefore they choose the easy route and ignore. To ignore is to be ignorant.
Those who refuse to identify and acknowledge corruption in something are soon engulfed in the corruption and become a part of the corruption. It much easier for them to hide their head in the sand and ignore the facts than it is to stand and fight for what is right. Therefore they choose the easy route and ignore. To ignore is to be ignorant.
No, to never be exposed to the corruption or to never understand that it IS corruption is to be ignorant. To see and understand the corruption and ignore it is something else. To see and recognize the corruption and claim that it is not corruption is itself corrupt, and we call it willful ignorance. Knowing the truth but rejecting the truth in favor of the more comfortable lie.
But all of that is semantics. (The meaning of meanings.)
Did you have any real point to all of that?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
Nor to reiterate points I've already made.
