Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Since it is not malicious code, I wouldn't call it a "virus," but its out-of-control nature does lend itself to the possibility of bad coding. It seems to be a harmless package that tries to do good things (tracking file changes for you is a good thing), but there's got to be a better way of keeping it under control than waiting for it to consume 100% CPU so it can be killed.
I also wonder whether this gam_server CPU cycle problem has something to do with my files/folders not being updated in Nautilus until I manually refresh?
Harmless? I tried the solution below - it seemed to work for awhile, now it doesn't!
I have a 4 CPU system. When two people are on it, and gam_server magically decides to use 2 CPUs, guess what happens? Its been going on for nearly a year.
Its a very serious thing to write a piece of software that uses all sorts of resources and won't die. It may not have been malicious, but that doesn't make it "harmless."
This computer is used for cancer research and wasting time monitering the system to assure that gam_server is not running amok is not a good use of time.
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfperkins
I am using RHEL 4 and did just that and it worked for me too.
Thanks a lot!
Belated thanks for me as well; I decided to tolerate this problem for as long as my patience would hold, which lasted until just now. Adding a line to (a new) /etc/gaminrc file, along with a 'kill -1' afterward, seem to have worked for me was well on RHEL4.
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by deesto
Belated thanks for me as well; I decided to tolerate this problem for as long as my patience would hold, which lasted until just now. Adding a line to (a new) /etc/gaminrc file, along with a 'kill -1' afterward, seem to have worked for me was well on RHEL4.
Looks like I have to retract my previous statement! Guess who came back for a visit:
Code:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
20139 jd 25 0 2728 1316 876 R 100 0.1 20713:15 gam_server
I've watched top for about an hour now, and this hasn't changed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.