LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You're right, I wasn't following this thread for a while now, I missed some of it.
To me it's quite funny tho, the whole situation. I don't think removing the system will change anything, only maybe the self-esteem of those who disagree with it. I usually am against typical reputation systems (mostly because I usually end up having a bad one), but in the case of LQ, here you typically don't make arguments (my arguments are always of the type "devil's advocate"), instead you help people and they say thanks. This means there will always be positive reputation or none at all. So, I'm not against it, I think maybe you people take it too seriously.
I also think most of the examples out there of misuse have to do with the attitude of the user. Their attitude isn't gonna change if you remove the thanks system. Do you think the contrary ?
Also, currently I think ErV is permabanned. (problem solved)
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,607
Original Poster
Rep:
The privacy feature only impacts the statistics tab in your profile, and does not completely opt you out of the "thanks" functionality. We're still watching usage and feedback on the feature closely and will make adjustments as necessary.
refrivacy feature Jeremy Ok I did miss something then
ref the post: I see that as the elitism which such a system can sometimes create, I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
I like the idea of thanking members, but the text that appears when someone has been thanked is bad, i.e. "The Following User Says Thank You to user For This Useful Post". It's not the wording that I have a problem with, it's that most words are capitalised. Could we have the words written normally (i.e. no capitals except where it's usual to have them)?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.