SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
While this is nice to know, i hope the 32bit tree will not be a keeper for 15.1 and beyond(in the hope it saves some time for Pat).
When I asked him a couple of months ago if his plan was to drop 32bit in v15.1,
his reply was that if that were his plan, he'd not be wasting his time with 32bit upgrades in current.
While this is nice to know, i hope the 32bit tree will not be a keeper for 15.1 and beyond(in the hope it saves some time for Pat).
Since we're speaking of culling and time saving, just a reminder almost complete KDE is available as flatpak as well as most 32bit applications, wine included. If we could free the dev team of the KDE burden (delegate it off to a flatpak add on method) and unload the multilib to it too (i have read people play on pure 64bit Slackware via flatpak on steam(!))?
Just saying, maybe it is worth investigating?
I'd rather have Slackware pruned of most if not all desktops and WMs come in same or faster pace, being ready when it's ready, than see the last Slackware ship KDE and then stop existing just because each release needs ever more work.
Also, is Gnome having a comeback to sanity or not?
DOCs, FAQs, HOW-TOs & man pages are only ever read by those who don't actually need to read them
and are _never_ read by those who do actually need to read them.
Heck, /usr/doc + /usr/man == 52,000 files that no-one who needs to ever reads.
So, free-up a bunch of disk space and reduce the download bandwidth by eliminating all of them from the distro.
Since we're speaking of culling and time saving, just a reminder almost complete KDE is available as flatpak as well as most 32bit applications, wine included. If we could free the dev team of the KDE burden (delegate it off to a flatpak add on method) and unload the multilib to it too (i have read people play on pure 64bit Slackware via flatpak on steam(!))?
Just saying, maybe it is worth investigating?
I'd rather have Slackware pruned of most if not all desktops and WMs come in same or faster pace, being ready when it's ready, than see the last Slackware ship KDE and then stop existing just because each release needs ever more work.
Also, is Gnome having a comeback to sanity or not?
DOCs, FAQs, HOW-TOs & man pages are only ever read by those who don't actually need to read them
and are _never_ read by those who do actually need to read them.
Heck, /usr/doc + /usr/man == 52,000 files that no-one who needs to ever reads.
So, free-up a bunch of disk space and reduce the download bandwidth by eliminating all of them from the distro.
/usr/doc/ mainly contains license files, that are mandatory
also changelog and release notes, combined with /usr/man, these are particularly useful when investigating FTBFS issues
running in virtualbox, after boot, CTRL+ALT+F2 enter tty2 (pic #1)
Code:
xinit /usr/bin/xterm -- :1
run xfwm4 in xterm (pic #2)
first time running there will be lots of error message and segfault
after that only segfault printed
dmesg has info also (pic #3)
running in virtualbox, after boot, CTRL+ALT+F2 enter tty2 (pic #1)
Code:
xinit /usr/bin/xterm -- :1
run xfwm4 in xterm (pic #2)
first time running there will be lots of error message and segfault
after that only segfault printed
dmesg has info also (pic #3)
I never changed my recommendation to use generic + initrd and don't plan to change any documentation regarding that. I just noted that it'll probably work better for that than the huge kernel did since the modules match the kernel better, and several footbullets have been unloaded.
Or another solution to the need of two sets of modules:
Don't provide huge kernels at all. Go back to slim generic kernels. You could probably even leave something out of them, something you have added to generic only to circumvent module problems with huge.
Use the generic kernel in the install image. udevd would load the root file system driver instead of them all built-in. The initrd image would be larger because of all the modules, but the kernel image would be smaller.
Initrd would then be mandatory on the installed system (except with custom kernels). And there would not be the larger memory usage of huger kernels.
EDIT: OK, dropping the huge kernel was already considered in ChangeLog.txt: "First of all, it's clear that some Slackware users have been using the huge kernel all along, without an initrd, and are (to say the least) unhappy about the prospect of a new requirement to start using one."
Last edited by Petri Kaukasoina; 10-29-2023 at 05:06 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.