LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris
User Name
Password
Solaris / OpenSolaris This forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-19-2001, 11:03 PM   #1
loganwva
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: SuSE 9.1
Posts: 117

Rep: Reputation: 15
Solaris


I'm thinking of trying Sun Solaris and would like to get some input on its pluses and minus. I used CDE at work and didn't like it, so I want to run Gnome as my window manger.

Right now I'm running Mandrake 8.1. I'm happy with Mandrake but its performance as for speed is not so good.

I was thinking that Solaris would be very stable and since it's a Sun product and Gnome and many other applications are either written my Sun or Sun is closely involved with the application then maybe there would be better stability and performance. A couple of things I was looking for are how is it's performance, are there enough applications, how well developed is Gnome on Solaris, does CDE have to be installed. All input helpful.
 
Old 11-20-2001, 06:35 AM   #2
SlCKB0Y
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 295

Rep: Reputation: 96
I've heard that unless you have sun hardware, solaris runs like poo. It wasnt ever really designed for i386 hardware. Why not try freebsd?
 
Old 11-21-2001, 08:06 PM   #3
epic
Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Shanghai,China
Distribution: Gentoo Linux 1.3b
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 15
right!

FreeBSD is very stable!
 
Old 11-22-2001, 01:38 PM   #4
SaltyNetGuru
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: the beach soon!
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
uuuum, close

actually the new Solaris 8 runs not to bad on i386 as long as ya got at least a gig processor and alot of ram, also as long as you dont try to run it giving up services (like running as a work Email server). If you want to use it and paly with it ,it should do just fine.
 
Old 11-22-2001, 07:39 PM   #5
epic
Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Shanghai,China
Distribution: Gentoo Linux 1.3b
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 15
really?I want get one.where can I get it --solaris 8 for intel
 
Old 11-23-2001, 07:38 AM   #6
dorward
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2001
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 760

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally posted by epic
really?I want get one.where can I get it --solaris 8 for intel
From Sun of course.
 
Old 12-14-2001, 10:26 AM   #7
SlCKB0Y
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 295

Rep: Reputation: 96
Re: uuuum, close

Quote:
Originally posted by SaltyNetGuru
actually the new Solaris 8 runs not to bad on i386 as long as ya got at least a gig processor and alot of ram, also as long as you dont try to run it giving up services (like running as a work Email server). If you want to use it and paly with it ,it should do just fine.
think about how rediculous what you're saying is. unless you have a GIG processor. just to run a OS?????!?!?

that is rediculous. you can run freebsd on next to nothing, and run it well. so why not run it. plus its got less restrictive licensing.
 
Old 01-09-2002, 03:08 PM   #8
hafnium
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2000
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Gnome on Solaris

I've tried running GNOME on Solaris and it worked quite nicely. I haven't seen Solaris on Intel - so I can't really shed an opinion about that. According to news I saw today, they are not going to put out an i386 version of Solaris 9.
 
Old 01-09-2002, 03:24 PM   #9
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
you can always try Slackware which is very close to Solaris as well.. and it runs great on about any intel machine.. with gnome too..
 
Old 01-30-2002, 10:50 AM   #10
SaltyNetGuru
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: the beach soon!
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Re: Re: uuuum, close

Quote:
Originally posted by SlCKB0Y


think about how rediculous what you're saying is. unless you have a GIG processor. just to run a OS?????!?!?

that is rediculous. you can run freebsd on next to nothing, and run it well. so why not run it. plus its got less restrictive licensing.
I agree, Solaris if your gonna run it seriuos as in a server run it only on a Sparc. but if you dont have a Sparc and only want to be able to run the OS to get a feel for it, and since most i386 boxes have a gig go for it.PS. I like FreeBSD much better as well!
 
Old 02-01-2002, 12:09 PM   #11
goneaway
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Denver, Colorado, United States
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, Rubyx
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 15
solaris is free

from Sun for non-commercial use. It is available for numerous chip sets and runs just fine on older hardware. The Sparc station that I use sometimes is 33 Mz.

<insert pointless plug for the distribution of your choice here>
 
Old 07-26-2002, 09:35 PM   #12
Iknowit101
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
Distribution: Red Hat/Clarkconnect
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hey, hey

I just took a Solaris course and someone gave me a copy of Solaris 8 (for INTEL) I am running it in a P II 233 at home with 128 MB mem and 4 gb HD and is running ok, of course I am just playing with it so I am not running it as a production server, I just one to get familiar with it.
If U really want it you can go to the SUN site and download it for $20 just look for the Intel version.
 
Old 07-31-2002, 10:39 AM   #13
Nigel_Tufnel
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Easton, PA
Distribution: Debian, Kubuntu, Arch
Posts: 116

Rep: Reputation: 15
I remember getting Slowlaris installed on my PC back in 96. What a bitch! If you want to run a real unix you should try one of the BSD variants. I heard they're pretty easy to setup and have decent driver support.
 
Old 08-01-2002, 08:51 AM   #14
KayJay
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: dev/null
Distribution: redhat, mandrake
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by trickykid
you can always try Slackware which is very close to Solaris as well.. and it runs great on about any intel machine.. with gnome too..
hmmmm I thought Solaris was built on a microkernel and Slack on a monolytical kernel?
 
Old 08-01-2002, 11:16 AM   #15
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally posted by KayJay


hmmmm I thought Solaris was built on a microkernel and Slack on a monolytical kernel?
What I meant by my statement was that Slackware is the most Unix like, and Solaris is Unix.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
great solaris website for newbies http://solaris-x86.org/ feetyouwell Solaris / OpenSolaris 2 12-06-2006 12:14 AM
Windows and FC3 and Solaris---and only Solaris boot error message zillah Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 07-07-2005 10:17 PM
Solaris Beginner (want to about solaris os) emailssent Solaris / OpenSolaris 2 09-19-2004 07:38 AM
new to solaris - is it possible to multi-boot with solaris? spyghost Solaris / OpenSolaris 6 02-08-2004 06:39 PM
Solaris Noob wants solaris firewall lhiggins Solaris / OpenSolaris 3 05-09-2003 03:22 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration